Most spraying technologies performed
similarly at low and high water rates when appropriate nozzles were used at
recommended pressures and heights.
Some sprayers and aerial applications have been using less than five gallons per acre, even though the crop protection industry generally believes high water rates provide the proper coverage and penetration needed for optimum weed control.
“But farmers would like to use lower water rates for economic and practical reasons,” says Brian Storozynsky, sprayer technology specialist with the AgTech Centre in Lethbridge.
Current water rates used by southern Alberta growers to apply foliar fungicide range from 10 to 20 gallons per acre (gpa) and to apply herbicides range from five to 10 gpa. In some desiccation applications rates up to 40 gpa are recommended.
High water rates certainly reduce spray drift and provide extra coverage, especially for grassy-type weeds. Extra coverage is more beneficial for grassy weeds than for broadleaf weeds because of the low number of spray droplets that typically end up on vertically growing weed leaves and stems.
SO IS CUTTING RATES OK?
A number of studies have tried to answer this question. The overall result from a 2005 and 2006 fungicide study in dry beans is that different water application rates of 10, 20 and 30 gpa did not significantly affect disease incidence. Studies done between 1999 and 2001 had similar results when comparing foliar fungicides on dry beans using water rates of five and 15 gpa.
In another study, over four years, water rates of five and 20 gpa were used to desiccate potato crops prior to harvesting. Again, no significant difference resulted from using less water as both treatments still required a second application to completely desiccate the potato vines.
Five years of testing using herbicides in cereal crops and field peas showed similar results in water rates. At recommended chemical rates, results were similar for 10 gpa and five gpa with the nozzle types studied. All nozzles used in these studies were operated at manufacturers’ recommendations. Only one year of a five-year study using a contact herbicide in a canola crop showed applying five gpa had less weed control than at 10 gpa. “This may be attributed to moisture conditions and weed populations being abnormally high that spring,” says Storozynsky .
Some years, in adverse growing conditions such as advanced weed stages and high weed populations, plots sprayed at 10 gpa showed weed control was usually more consistent and scored just slightly higher than at five gpa, although results at both rates were always commercially acceptable. “This indicates that identifying growing conditions is as important as selecting water rates,” says Storozynsky.
KEY RESEARCH FINDINGS
Most spraying technologies performed similarly at low and high water rates when appropriate nozzles were used at recommended pressures and heights. Herbicide efficacy depended more on herbicide type and rate, weed growth stage, population and growing conditions rather than water rates.
“The take-home message is to identify growing conditions and select a water rate and nozzle type suited for the condition. If in doubt, follow the chemical manufacturer’s recommendations for water rates and nozzle type,” says Storozynsky.
During extremely wet growing conditions or heavy weed populations, using recommended chemical rates, spraying at early stages and using higher nozzle pressures improved efficacy, especially for venturi-type (air-induced) nozzles. Not all air induction nozzles produced the same coverage and spray droplet sizes. Some research has shown that using high-pressure air-induction nozzles required higher water volumes or higher operating pressures to achieve commercially acceptable control for grassy-type weeds.
In terms of the sprayer type used, air assist systems showed more potential in fungicide applications, while electrostatic sprayers were more effective in pre-burn applications.
Spraying technologies performed similarly when appropriate nozzles were selected and used at recommended pressures and spraying heights, Storozynsky adds. Producers can access assistance by checking the AgTech Nozzle Selector. That independent tool is being developed by the AgTech Centre to assist producers with knowledge on various nozzle types.
More information on the AgTech Nozzle Selector is available in a Special Report available on the independent website Canada Sprayer Guide at www.CanadaSprayerGuide.com.
Meristem Information Resources Ltd. is an independent communications company telling the best stories from inside agriculture, food and the environment across Canada. The company operates websites at www.meristem.comand www.canadasprayerguide.com