Organic farmers' suit against Monsanto goes to hearing

Jan 5, 2012 11:59 PM - 9 comments
TEXT SIZE bigger text smaller text
By: Staff

A court hearing in New York City at the end of this month will determine if a "pre-emptive" lawsuit by a clutch of U.S. and Canadian organic producers against seed and ag chem firm Monsanto will go ahead.

U.S. District Judge Naomi Buchwald said she will hear oral arguments Jan. 31 in Manhattan on a motion by St. Louis, Mo.-based Monsanto to dismiss the suit filed last March 31 by a group of 83 farmers, seed growers and farm organizations.

The suit "seeks court protection for innocent family farmers who may become contaminated by Monsanto seed," according to a release last week from the Colorado-based lead plaintiff, the Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association (OSGATA).

The suit, the plaintiffs claim, is "to protect themselves from being accused of patent infringement should their crops ever become contaminated by Monsanto's genetically modified seed."

"Last August we submitted our written rebuttal and it made clear that Monsanto's motion was without merit," OSGATA president Jim Gerritsen, a seed potato grower in northern Maine, said in the release. "Our legal team, from the Public Patent Foundation, is looking forward to orally presenting our position."

Canadian plaintiffs attached to the suit include Ottawa-based Canadian Organic Growers (COG), Quebec advocacy group Union Paysanne, the Manitoba Organic Alliance, the Peace River Organic Producers Association and a number of producers in Saskatchewan, Alberta, Manitoba and Ontario.

"Monsanto's technology is harmful for organic producers and processors," COG executive director Beth McMahon said in a separate release this week. "To penalize our growers for GMO contamination adds insult to injury, and we won't back down from this fight."

"Never been"

Monsanto's previous suits against farmers for alleged infringement on its patented seed suggest the company "intends to assert its transgenic seed patents against certified organic and nontransgenic seed farmers who come to possess more than 'trace amounts' of Monsanto's transgenic seed, even if it is not their fault," the plaintiffs claimed last year.

Between 1997 and April 2010, the organic producers' suit claims, Monsanto filed 144 lawsuits against farmers in at least 27 different states for alleged infringement of its transgenic seed patents and/or breach of its license to those patents.

In the list of farmers who the suit claims "did not want to be contaminated by transgenic seed" but had been sued by Monsanto, the only Canadian farmer mentioned by name is Percy Schmeiser of Bruno, Sask.

Monsanto successfully sued Schmeiser for patent violation over Roundup Ready canola in 2001, a decision upheld at the Supreme Court of Canada in 2004.

Monsanto, on its website, has said that in the Schmeiser case, Roundup Ready canola was "knowingly planted" using saved seed, not "blown in on the wind nor carried in by birds, and it didn't spontaneously appear."

Monsanto last spring described the OSGATA-led suit as "a publicity stunt designed to confuse the facts about American agriculture."

The company has said it "has never been, nor will it be Monsanto policy to exercise its patent rights where trace amounts of our patented seed or traits are present in farmers' fields as a result of inadvertent means."

Related stories:

More Canadians hop onto Monsanto GMO suit, June 1, 2011

Organic players join "pre-emptive" U.S. suit against Monsanto, April 5, 2011

Photos

Monsanto, developer of a number of in-the-seed trait technologies, has said it will never be company policy to sue farmers whose fields turn up trace amounts of its patented genes due to inadvertent means. (Photo courtesy Monsanto)
Larger photo & full caption

File size: 106 KB (500px X 667px)
Caption: Monsanto, developer of a number of in-the-seed trait te...


Horizontal ruler

Reader Comments

Most recent firstOldest first

G. Lowther

I think that farmers who grow organic have a right to sue Monsanto for their frankenstein products contaminating the pure products. I think since Monsanto has a patent on their product, they should also be responsible for controlling it so cross contamination does not occur. Lets put the problem back in the hands of the monsters that created it.

Posted May 1, 2013 12:27 AM


david webster

david webster got ngmo soybeans containated byroundup ready seed aprox 1 plant in 100 had uslly one pod with one seed that was different had traces of roundup genes in that one seed in the 1% of the plant the soybeans had to go for crusher at a loss of of the premiums and i tryed to talk to monsanto they would send a rep out to check the field or take any responsiblty and said they could understand me it now before the courts david webster 820 turnberry rd huronlee nursing home room 11 brusels ont canada 5198879299

Posted January 12, 2013 01:31 PM


Andrea Psoras

Patents can be revoked. The US Patent office did this to a friend of mine, Dr. Randall Mills, who is successful in a form of compressing the hydrogen electron closer to the nucleus and uses water to do this.

Lest Monsanto think it can patent in a manner or obtain and hold patents without protest or prejudice that exploit or expropriate circumstances and legitimizes it as a 'free' rider with feudal power speaks poorly of any party in this process that facilitated this corruption and petty tyranny and abuse of those who are not in a position to corale the means for 'science' and materials that are building blocks in matter in nature.

Posted February 26, 2012 12:56 AM


Dan

why is the grainews mobile app sponsored by Pioneer from DuPont? silly.

Posted January 18, 2012 12:13 PM


bob bouche

monsanto and its thugs need to be punished- life sentence of eating gmo's

Posted January 14, 2012 07:23 PM


FirstPrevNextLast
Horizontal Ruler

Post A Comment

Disclaimer
Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that Grainews has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published and those that are published will not be edited. However, all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Your Name (this will appear with your post) *

Email Address (will not be published) *

Comments *



* mandatory fields